<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: accounting.see if you can answer this?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:31:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindcrime828</title>
		<link>http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>mindcrime828</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>No...inventory is recorded on the books at the lower of cost or market (LCM rule).  The only time inventory would not be recorded at cost is when the market value (current cost to replace) drops below the original cost.  LCM by item is required by the IRS unless using the LIFO (Last In - First Out) method of inventory valuation, which wouldnt apply to this type of business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;inventory is recorded on the books at the lower of cost or market (LCM rule).  The only time inventory would not be recorded at cost is when the market value (current cost to replace) drops below the original cost.  LCM by item is required by the IRS unless using the LIFO (Last In &#8211; First Out) method of inventory valuation, which wouldnt apply to this type of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Deth</title>
		<link>http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Deth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>NO - that&#039;s where profit comes from, selling at a higher price than he paid. If you increase the cost without declaring income for the increase, you&#039;re cheating and you will get audited and fined by the IRS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO &#8211; that&#8217;s where profit comes from, selling at a higher price than he paid. If you increase the cost without declaring income for the increase, you&#8217;re cheating and you will get audited and fined by the IRS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander K</title>
		<link>http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.programmecollector.com/accountingsee-if-you-can-answer-this/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>He could, but this would be  terribly stupid move from the tax stand point. Since, the increase in the inventory would be recorded as income and therefore be taxable. No one does that. That is exactly the same situation as with any other asset.
Say a company purchased a building for 1,000,000 dollars. As long as they hold the building they will be depreciating it, actually recording a loss due to depreciation in value, when in fact it is not uncommon for the building to increase in value.
But that increase will be recognized as Capital Gain at the time when the asset is sold.
If your friend attempts to record income due to value increase, he will also have a terrible cash flow problems, as he will be responsible for income taxes for non-cash income item. 
In general if not always, no one wants to recognize any appreciation in value until asset is sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He could, but this would be  terribly stupid move from the tax stand point. Since, the increase in the inventory would be recorded as income and therefore be taxable. No one does that. That is exactly the same situation as with any other asset.<br />
Say a company purchased a building for 1,000,000 dollars. As long as they hold the building they will be depreciating it, actually recording a loss due to depreciation in value, when in fact it is not uncommon for the building to increase in value.<br />
But that increase will be recognized as Capital Gain at the time when the asset is sold.<br />
If your friend attempts to record income due to value increase, he will also have a terrible cash flow problems, as he will be responsible for income taxes for non-cash income item.<br />
In general if not always, no one wants to recognize any appreciation in value until asset is sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

