Comments on: Which is a better collectible for a sports fan, an autographed jersey or autographed helmet?

By: micheal c

micheal c — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:30:00 +0000

My autographed John Lynch Buccanneer jersey is probably the greatest thing a fan could ever have. But then again, I keep it concealed in plastic, so it doesn’t fade in the light.

By: J G

J G — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:19:52 +0000

you can’t lose with either one , the jersey you can frame and hang up , but the helmet you can put in a trophy case , with like a light coming from under it

By: That Infamous Kid

That Infamous Kid — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:52:07 +0000

go with a jersey

By: steven s

steven s — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:11:39 +0000

You can’t go wrong with either one. I like the helmets better because they can be displayed many different ways. A jersey can only be hung and you can only display one side. They can fade and worse worn and never washed. Yes you can put a regular sized helmet on but you don’t have to worry (as much) about getting it dirty.

By: Sojourner

Sojourner — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:24:20 +0000

Depends on the person, but in general a jersey is better than a helmet, easier to display than a helmet. You can also find the player that said person likes. That would probably make it even more special.

By: orange c

orange c — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:31:22 +0000

I usually get autographs on something that had meaning…like a ticket to a game I attended. Or a picture taken with the athlete.

But we have the usual stuff too…footballs, jerseys, basketballs, etc.

By: phatboy

phatboy — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:39:51 +0000

A helmet is for two reasons: They cost more in the first place, and they don’t show wear(such as discoloring,and deterioration) .

By: Adam

Adam — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:34:16 +0000

A Jersey can be displayed more easily.. so personally, I’d prefer that. But a helmet is cool too. If you can get something game-worn to be signed, that’s even better.